Tuesday, November 13, 2007

Easy Law?

By Frank Vanderlugt
Sometimes you have an easy law question that you need an answer to. Although some legal issues are complicated, others are fairly straight forward and easy to answer. You don’t want to spend a fortune to get an answer to an easy question.

Whether you need advice on divorce, taxes, real estate, or estate planning, you can often find the answers you need for easy questions yourself or at a low cost to you. Thankfully, the internet provides a good tool for you to find answers to the questions you have. You can find a great deal of information online easily and in no time at all.

One of the things that you can find online is legal forms that you can replicate for your situation. Whether you need a bill of sale for a car, an example of a will, or forms for setting up a new small business, you can often find a form online that can be adapted to your situation. When the form you need is straight forward, you can save time and money by finding an example online.

You can also search online for information on various aspects of law. There are many websites that offer information on different legal areas. These are great places to start learning about the area of law that you need answers in.

Some websites offer glossaries with various legal terms defined so that you can understand better a legal document that you are dealing with. You may also be able to find articles that discuss different legal problems that are common for people to run into. Learning more about the area of law that you are dealing with gives you a better understanding of the process and what you can expect.

You may also be able to find websites that have experts on staff to answer your questions. Some websites also do live chats with attorneys knowledgeable about a particular legal aspect. In these cases, the answers given are for informational purposes only, but you can still get easy law answers that can help you.

If you want to consult with a legal professional, you can always see if they’ll offer you a free consultation. If the question you have is simple, they may not charge you a fee for talking to you about your question. For example, maybe you want to know if a potential lawsuit has merit. One of the ways to determine this is to consult with a legal professional.

Whether you look for easy law answers online or with a lawyer in person, you should make sure that the information you receive will be good information. Make sure that the person giving you the answer has a law degree from a respected institution and that the site or firm is reputable.

For most easy law answers, you don’t need to spend a fortune to have your question answered. In some cases, you can find the answer yourself online. You can also often find free or low cost legal advice for other questions. If your question is a complicated or specialized one, you should consult with a knowledgeable attorney even if it costs a little more.

Frank j Vanderlugt owns and operates http://www.easylex.net 2 Easylexnet

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

Timeshare Resale Resort

By P Abbey
When it comes to timeshare resale resort offers there are certain important factors that you need to take into consideration and understand to avoid you actually paying too much for yours. Below we are going to take a look at some of these factors and which will help to ensure that you get more for your money when you do purchase a timeshare resale.

Firstly it is important that you have a clear understanding of the resorts rating where you are considering purchasing your timeshare at. Just because a resort comes with either a five star or gold rating does not mean that when it comes to you selling your timeshare on at a later date if you wish you won't get more money for it. Rather what you should be aiming to do is buying a property which is actually located in a resort that is in high demand.

Secondly as previously mentioned location rather than the rating of the resort is highly important. If you are someone who is looking to exchange your two weeks at your resort with someone at another one then a high demand resort is more likely to get you the exchanges that you want at the time of year that you want. So look for those resorts where a large number of people who want to actually vacation and such areas include Hawaii, Florida Coast and Orlando (for Disney World), the Caribbean and Cancun.

Thirdly if you are going to buy a timeshare resale try to get your accommodation in a period during the high part of the season. As you will soon discover people are more willing to exchange the two weeks at their resort for the two weeks at yours if you have it during the most important part of the year.

Another thing to take into consideration when choosing to buy a resale timeshare rather than a new one is choose a resort where their maintenance fees are not too high. Remember this is not a payment that you will be making just once. Rather you will go on paying this particular fee until such time as you choose to sell your ownership of the timeshare that you have. This is also a cost that you will need to factor into your budget when considering buying a property at such a resort.

Finally if you can use the services of a licensed real estate broker in order to make the purchase. Certainly when it comes to buying any kind of property at a timeshare resale resort it is not as simple as you imagine when you compare it buying a more conventional piece of real estate. But by using the services of a licensed real estate broker not only will they be able to guide you through the process of making your purchase easily but you are protected should anything untoward happen. As by law if they carry out any kind of fraudulent business then it will cost them dearly.


P Abbey owns and operates http://www.timesharesreviewed.com/timeshareresaleresort.html Timeshare Resale Resort

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

Torts 101

By John Anthony Concepcion
A tort is any injury to a person caused by another. It is not based on a criminal act, although in some cases it can be. It is civil in nature and the liability can be enforced through a civil action.

For example, a person slips and falls inside the premises of a building because of poor maintenance by the owner. He suffers injury and hospitalized. If he can prove that the owner was remiss in his responsibility to keep his building safe, then he can file a civil action to recover a sum of money to compensate him for his injury.

People file tort cases against offenders for four main reasons. First is to compensate the victim for the injury he or she suffered because of an act or omission of another person. Second, it is to compel, by way of a court action, the guilty party to compensate the victim for all the injuries suffered as well as for all the consequential effects of those injuries. Third, it works as a preventive measure against the re-occurrence of the negligent action in the future. Lastly, it is to safeguard the rights of the offended party.

There are three main kinds of torts and they are differentiated by the nature of the liability of the guilty party. These are torts based on negligence, strict liability and intentional wrong.

The first kind is an easy one. It is like saying that the guilty party is to blame for another’s injury because he failed to prevent it and he has a duty to keep it from happening. For example, an owner of a merry-go-round is supposed to ensure that no one is injured while riding in his equipment. If someone does, the owner is liable once proven that his negligence was the cause of the injury.

The second one is tort based on strict liability, which is a species of personal injury. It applies to manufacturers who release to the market defective products and causes injury to people. For example, if a person is injured because of faulty brakes in a bicycle, the manufacturer can be held liable if the product was inherently defective to start with.

The third kind is the tort based on intentional wrong, an example of which is when someone knew that what he was doing will cause injury but decides to go through with it. The person is liable both criminally (if applicable) and civilly liable, meaning he can be sentenced to serve jail time and pay damages to the victim.

If you have experienced any of these three kinds of torts, then it would be better to consult trial lawyers who are well versed in handling torts cases. There are many law firms in California that specializes in personal injury and claims based on torts.

We have personal injury trial lawyers California who have excellent qualifications and track record in handling California Personal Injury Trial Cases.

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

The tort reform movement’s failure to launch2

By: John Anthony Concepcion
The law on torts is there for a reason. It helps prevent the introduction of faulty and unsafe products in the market. It makes medical practitioners more careful. It protects the interest of those aggrieved and works as an equalizer since an impoverished victim can go after the biggest company that had been negligent in checking its products before it released them to the public. It levels the battlefield even for the handicapped.

It is like saying that the city government itself should not indemnify the person who was hit by a government employee driving a Los Angeles-owned vehicle.

Overall, it all boils down to a debate on interest. The real question is who stands to benefit from all this tort reforms being advocated? In whose interest are all these proposed changes for?

The answers are readily apparent from the proposals themselves. Moreover, it counters the basic legal maxim that the law should always favor those who have less in life.

Our law firm's Los Angeles Attorneys are also expert Los Angeles Court Lawyers for various lawsuits involving Personal Injury, Employment, Business and Social Security Disability issues.

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

The tort reform movement’s failure to launch1

By John Anthony Concepcion
For some years now, a debate has been occasionally distracting this country on whether or not reforms should be introduced in our civil law system, particularly in the area of torts. The discussion was put in motion by what many call as the tort reform movement, which had been met with an equally strong opposition from those who advocate the preservation of the status quo.

For the benefit of those who do not have an idea of what "tort" means, it has been legally defined as "a negligent or intentional civil wrong not arising out of a contract or statute" (http://www.lectlaw.com/def2/t032.htm). It came from the French legal term "avoir tort," which literally means, "to have wronged."

It pertains to a wrongful act that causes harm to a person’s body, reputation and in some cases, property. The most common form of liability arising from a breach of the law on torts is that of personal injury.

The primary objective of a case on torts is to compensate, remedy and indemnify the victim of the loss or injury he or she suffered because of an intentional or negligent act.

The crux of the tort reform movement is in its description of tort cases as "frivolous lawsuits" which tend to frustrate the administration of justice by clogging the courts with baseless claims in pursuit of monetary gains.

As an indirect effect, tort reform advocates say it slows down economic growth because the big business companies that are the subject of these suits spend millions of dollars in settlements on practically unfounded claims. It has been further argued that court lawyers get an unusually large share in these settlements. (For more information on the tort reform movement, visit the website of the American Tort Reform Association at http://www.atra.org)

In order to supposedly change this state of affairs, supporters of tort reform propose amendments to the law on torts such as, but not limited to, changes in the products liability law; abolition of the solitary liability rule; and to put limitations on the liabilities for medical malpractice, punitive damages and non-economic damages.

Objectively speaking, the issues raised by pro-reform advocates and the ends they seek to achieve are quite sensible and proper. However, the means may not be as palatable to many as they hope it is, and it ends up as just another wrong way to fix a malady.

If the tort reforms being proposed and its advocates were to be taken at face value, it would appear that they are in favor of those sued on a tort case. It is like taking the advantage away from those injured by the negligence or acts of the supposed guilty parties and the battlefield becomes unequal.

If the intention is to prevent frivolous lawsuits, then the proper way to minimize such suits is to institute changes in the judicial system in order to weed out the frivolous claims from the legitimate ones. In fact, the proposals of the tort reform movement operate as a carte blanche that will affect even the claims of legitimate victims.

Our law firm's Los Angeles Attorneys are also expert Los Angeles Court Lawyers for various lawsuits involving Personal Injury, Employment, Business and Social Security Disability issues.

Article Source: http://www.ArticleBiz.com

personal laws